Effective leader Essay

Imagine a world without loss leading. A attractor, delimit by Websters Dictionary, is a person who rules, or guides others. When we think of leadinghip, we think of leaders of things as big as countries or nations, and as small as towns or even schools. Different types of leaders harbour duties they produce to fulfill but one thing that all effective leaders atomic number 18, is strong willed, knowledgeable, and powerful. In rough times in history, it may be true that these three words bring out a side of the word effective that is not usually thought of. Effective means, producing the desired or mean result. The intended result varies for different leaders. So could a leader be effective even when they do not cause a positive effect to their attendants? How about leaders Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Napoleon nap?One effective leader to date is Adolf Hitler, a political leader of the Nazi Party and prime minister leader in Germany from 1933 to 1945. Adolf Hitler was a very powerful leader while also being an injustice leader.Joseph Stalin, an underestimated monster in European history, was as effective as it gets. Stalin is known for two things, industrially revolutionizing, and agriculturally revolutionizing. He was strong-willed about both of these plans. Stalins famous Five-Year Plans started off with developing the Soviet Unions economy by setting extremely high numerical goals, to increase the out grade of steel, coal, oil, and electricity. To achieve these quotas, concourse had to face shortages of food, clothing and other necessities. This proves Stalin was strong-willed because he set a goal for himself and his country and although it put his people at risk, he had an idea in his mind that nothing would come in between. another(prenominal) example of how Joseph Stalin was an effective leader is his success during his agricultural revolution. In 1928, the government began to s ixver 25 one million million million private farms in the Soviet Union and combined these small farms into large, government owned farms, called collective farms. The collective farms were expected to boost food production because of the modern machinery, and reduce the number of workers. When workers resisted, Stalin used terror and violence in hope for them to react in a working manner. Theends justified the means for Stalin. Stalin is a Machiavellian figure in history, and that is why this example shows that Stalin was a strong-willed leader.A vigorous formed armed forces is one of the keys to a successful nation. Napoleon Bonaparte is one of the most well known armament leaders of all times, but why? To be a good military leader, you have to be a lot of things, one of them being knowledgeable. In order to have a successful military, it is not just about the weapons and the strength of the soldiers but even more about the thought process, strategies, and tactics. Napoleon commanded 34 battles and lost only 6 and ended up dominating Europe. This proves Napoleon was a knowledgeable leader because to be able to command an army that is able to win 28 out 34 battles in Europe in the 23 year time frame of 1792-1815, that commander really would have had to have an idea of what he was doing. Another example of how Napoleon was a knowledgeable leader is his military strategies.wheresoever you go, you are bound to find someone who is not a proud follower of the leader of the endue that they are in. Sometimes, this is because of ignorant opinions, but more importantly, sometimes it is because of the choices that leader makes. Being a leader of anything is the hardest subcontract in the world. You are put in charge of something and you are expected to well educated, fair, etc., but what if your fair is different than one of your followers fair. Disagreements between leaders and followers are the main fountain of political controversy and separation between groups. From good leaders to bad leaders, it is worthy that a ll leaders are strong-willed, knowledgeable, and powerful. Wherever you go, you are bound to find someone who is not a proud follower of the leader of the place that they are in. Sometimes, this is because of ignorant opinions, but more importantly, sometimes it is because of the choices that leader makes. Being a leader of anything is the hardest job in the world. You are put in charge of something and you are expected to well educated, fair, etc., but what if your fair is different than one of your followers fair. Disagreements between leaders and followers are the main reason of political controversy and separation between groups.From good leaders to bad leaders, it is notablethat all leaders are strong-willed, knowledgeable, and powerful. Wherever you go, you are bound to find someone who is not a proud follower of the leader of the place that they are in. Sometimes, this is because of ignorant opinions, but more importantly, sometimes it is because of the choices that leader ma kes. Being a leader of anything is the hardest job in the world. You are put in charge of something and you are expected to well educated, fair, etc., but what if your fair is different than one of your followers fair. Disagreements between leaders and followers are the main reason of political controversy and separation between groups. From good leaders to bad leaders, it is notable that all leaders are strong-willed, knowledgeable, and powerful.